[dralley]

>Facebook, Google Search and Chrome, the most discussed products in current antitrust discussions all have viable quality alternatives.

People need to stop thinking of Google and Facebook as if they offer consumer services. They don't. Their product is their ads, and their consumers are corporate marketing departments, and through this lens they are both thoroughly monopolists. Or at least "duopolists".

https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-ad-spending-update

See also: AMP, internet.org

[DubiousPusher]

That's a take I hadn't considered. Google's danger as a monopoly comes more from the situation in which you have to pay them to sell anything on the web. That's a much more interesting argument.

[judge2020]

And one that the GOP will actually care about. Truth be told the GOP doesn't care about the average American locked into 1/2 ISPs available to them, but when businesses are the ones being price gouged you can bet the GOP will be the one to save the day by regulating big tech.

[m463]

Don't think ads, they are identification services.