|
|
|
|
|
|
by jhrmnn
2570 days ago
|
|
|
My interpretation of the parent was that there is some hypothetical point at which basic needs (whatever they are) of all humans are satisfied and additional growth is about more comfort/less work. At that point one could in principle stop with growth. And with very skewed distribution, this hypothetical point is way further into the future than with even distribution. |
|
|
Yeah, but this is very different from saying growth is only necessary because of uneven wealth.