|
|
|
|
|
by tsimionescu
2618 days ago
|
|
MongoDB was already AGPL, but that didn't suffice. Amazon simply took the free version of MongoDB, as is, deployed it on its systems in a scalable way, and sold that to customers. They gave the code for MongoDB away, per the terms of the AGPL. Hence, the need for a new license. However, they seem to have kept the deployment infrastructure as a trade secret, and since that didn't interact directly with MongoDB's interfaces, it șes that it really didn't come under the scope of the AGPL. |
|
I think another commenter got it right: this is a fuss created by commercial entities that wanted to have their cake and eat it too.