[SpicyLemonZest]

Right, but leadership is needed to coordinate that change. The OSI needs to stand up and say "hey, the widespread use of permissive licenses is a threat to the open source community; please try to avoid them, and here's some ways you can accomplish your goals without a permissive license." Most open source projects aren't monetized, and most monetized projects won't be picked up by Amazon, so without a coordinated push permissive licenses are just the simplest way to go.

[Hello71]

the FSF have been saying that for longer than the OSI has existed. people mocked them for saying that they were idealistic and unreasonable.

[SpicyLemonZest]

The FSF takes the more extreme stance that general adoption just doesn't matter. If big companies ban libraries using their recommended viral licenses, that's not a problem they're looking to solve; it just means the people writing free software will have an advantage.

[edoceo]

And some donate to both. FSF is a big reason we chose GPLv3 - when at first I was thinking MIT.