If the exclusion zones were made as excessive as Chernobyl, sure, but most of the Chernobyl exclusion zone is safe today, and most of the rest could be made safe with relatively little additional effort. With even a somewhat more reasonable exclusion zone, if that was the trade-off and we could save those who die from fossil fuel plants today, it'd be an easy choice for my part.
Of course it's not a realistic trade-off - it's "easy" to make plants vastly safer than either.
Of course it's not a realistic trade-off - it's "easy" to make plants vastly safer than either.