|
|
|
|
|
by gthaman
2574 days ago
|
|
CTRL+F "debt" - nothing.
CTRL+F "interest" - nothing. Lets take a quick look at some numbers. [1] "The result is a massive run-up in debt. Though the MTA spent only $848 million on debt service in 2004, according to RPA, it is projected to spend more than three times as much, $2.67 billion, in 2014. Debt alone will eat up 17.6 percent of the MTA’s operating budget by 2014; worse, RPA says that an alternative calculation shows the 2014 debt load at 23.1 percent of the operating budget." [3] "By way of comparison, Syria has $30.1 billion in debt. Cuba has $28.9 billion. Twenty-eight other countries, from Ecuador to Jordan, Jamaica to Kenya, have less debt than the M.T.A." [1] https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2011/09/07/where-does-your-fare-...
[2] https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2015/0... |
|
If the question at hand was why the MTA provides such poor ongoing service with such a high budget, debt service would be part (but only part) of the answer. However, in terms why construction costs are so horrifically expensive as compared to literally anywhere else in the world, debt service plays no role in answering that question.