My previous (rather limited) understanding of Pathfinder was that it was just a text renderer, I didn't realize that it was a more general vector graphics package. Is the idea for Pathfinder that it should be integrated into Firefox for all its vector rendering needs (SVG and so forth)?
If you know that the result will not change over frames, blitting a cached image will always be faster than re-rendering.
It's not necessarily a need, just an improvement. That said pathfinder is fast enough already that it can deal with rendering interesting workloads every frames at 60fps, and will keep getting better at it, I think that there is room for improvement in the tiling phase.
I would like to eventually add the option to cache masks in a texture. I think this should probably be an option for the user and not something I do behind the user's back unless the user explicitly opts into heuristics, though.
So if I read this correctly, it's an algorithm that Firefox could use when it handles the HTML canvas tag. For instance to draw SVG or text. Is that correct? And the good thing here, is that it uses GPU instructions to determine occlusion, and thus speed up the drawing process.
What I don't get: if that's the case, shouldn't it be integrated at a lower level, i.e. not just for drawing SVG or text, but the whole of the canvas tag? Because that's where occlusion also could take place?
Yes, it would make sense to use Pathfinder for canvas as well. Some care is necessary to avoid regressing apps that read canvas data back from GPU to CPU frequently, to avoid thrashing the I/O bus, but in general it should be doable.
Thanks to Nical for the excellent writeup!