|
|
|
|
|
by Sawamara
2581 days ago
|
|
He has several a-prioris built into his argument, the most important hidden one is:
- Meat is inherently superior because we keep eating it (nevermind that we keep eating lentils and peas just fine for thousands of years)
- That your gut somehow cannot be introduced new things to it because the science is not clear on the long-term effects (regardless of how clear science are on the long term effects of processed red meat)
- Also, naturalistic fallacy, like hamburgers were natural entities that grow in gardens, and you just pluck them from the trees, and its oh-so-natural +1: If he is so worried about canola oil, just check what quality of oil burger king is using for frying his meat. |
|