|
|
|
|
|
|
by xkcd-sucks
2581 days ago
|
|
|
The history of science, and especially biology, suggests that there is a lot of stuff which isn't understood very well. Seeing no importance in an aspect of the natural world can be as much a comment on experimental design and human knowledge ("knowing what to look for") as on the phenomenon ostensibly being studied. Typically "being able to observe an effect" is contingent on some other dependent scientific "knowledge". |
|
|