|
|
|
|
|
by jorgeortiz85
5663 days ago
|
|
Over the past year, even in the little time we've had to
work on the paper, we've learned a lot more about parsing
with derivatives.
In the week after the community found it, you all taught
us ten times more than that. Thank you!
Why isn't all computer science research done like this? |
|
In short, there is a paranoid mentality in academia that if people let their ideas go before formal publication, they'll be "scooped."
I'll admit to falling prey to that mentality too.
This experiment has made me rethink a lot of my assumptions.
I'd say that, in general, most papers wouldn't elicit a community response like this.
I think the fact that this paper was on parsing, a topic accessible and important to many, helped fuel the interest.
I bet if I arXived the rest of my rejected papers (all on static analysis of dynamic languages), there wouldn't be much of a commotion.
But, I'm intrigued enough to give it another shot. I'll write a blog post about another rejected paper in the near future, release the draft on arXiv, post the reviews and see what happens.
If it happens again, maybe "naked science" is a realistic proposition.