|
|
|
|
|
by kakwa_
2584 days ago
|
|
1) The spire rebuilt in 1859 by Viollet-Le-Duc didn't have XIXe century look, it was heavily inspired by the one of the Orleans cathedral 2) Even with that, Viollet-Le-Duc is somewhat criticized for it's restoration works as he generally chose what looked "nice" as opposed to historical accuracy or significance. Rebuilding the spire in a modern style would be a mistake in my opinion, or at the very least, a huge risk of style disunity of the building, rebuilding in Gothic style maybe boring but it's safe. As to which technics could be used, that's another matter. Notre-Dame would not be the first cathedral to be rebuilt using the technics of the day. Reims was rebuilt using concret, and the result is actually quite beautiful: https://img.aws.la-croix.com/2019/04/17/1301016385/charpente... Others were rebuilt using steel, Metz Cathedral for example. |
|