|
|
|
|
|
by AnthonyMouse
2584 days ago
|
|
It's not a question of infallibility. Legislators will make mistakes. They're human. The question is, what do you do when you find one? Option one is that you go back to the legislature and have them fix the law, which then applies to future conduct. Particularly for issues affecting ongoing operations on this scale, this is a completely reasonable option. Option two is that you go to the court and ask them to remake the law and apply it retroactively to past conduct, then impose billions of dollars in fines for following the law as it was written. But option one doesn't extract revenue from foreign companies. Which is why people are suspicious of your motives when you jump to option two. Option one also has the advantage that it can produce more coherent results, because the legislature doesn't have to operate under the pretext that it isn't making a change to the law when it really is. |
|
I don't think we need to cater to paranoid Americans.
> Option one also has the advantage that it can produce more coherent results, because the legislature doesn't have to operate under the pretext that it isn't making a change to the law when it really is.
It's perfectly reasonable for a legislature to assume it isn't changing the law when the law isn't being changed and it's not the legislature that is acting.