| > Tests are not automatically run and centrally reported as part of the installation process. I _hate_ this working on Java/Maven projects. Why do I need to run all the tests in order to install dependencies? The tests should have been run at _packaging_ time. I'm installing binary dependencies, why should I not trust that they have been tested? These are fundamentally separate concerns. If you're worried about the robustness of your dependencies, review them first. > There is no good heuristic for picking one package over the other when they occupy a similar problem space. This is mostly a cultural problem, the community's efforts are lackluster. Stars on Github? Issues opened vs closed? Stack Overflow? The community is active in all sorts of places and it's not that hard to get a feel for the prevailing best tool for a given job. It just takes a little effort. The community's responsibility is to maintain those parts which they have created, not give you recommendations. > virtualenv is not installed by default python -m venv > Semiautomatic packaging tools (e.g. pypi into rpm) If you want to package your application and its dependencies as an OS package, that's fine. Do it as a single unit and isolate it from the rest of the system. We have venv (or pyenv if you need a different version of Python) to solve this. I've experienced every headache there is with Python packaging. It's been bad, it is now better but still rather quirky, but it does require some domain knowledge. If you know how to use it, you will rarely experience serious problems. |