[mirimir]

OK, I get it.

> But don't expect them to choose to lose money while their competitors burn coal, undercut them and put them out of business because you decided that them doing that should be perfectly legal.

The problem is that entrenched corporations more or less own governments, so they get the laws that work for them.

[AnthonyMouse]

> The problem is that entrenched corporations more or less own governments, so they get the laws that work for them.

So what are you proposing to do about it?

Notice also that the corporations in this case are the fossil fuel companies, not the data center companies. To Amazon a marginal increase (if that) in energy costs to use solar is just something they get to mark up and pass on to the customer, as long as their competitors have to do the same thing. To oil and coal companies an effective carbon tax is ultimately the end of their business and they'll use every dirty trick in the book to try to prevent that.

So how do you get a much-needed carbon tax when it would cost oil and coal companies literally trillions of dollars and they'll fight that hard to prevent it? What's your proposal?

[schiffern]

First thing's first: stop pretending that "we the people" made the laws. If you can't recognize the problem, you certainly can't fix it.

https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/fi...

I don't think mirimir was putting forth a fully-formed plan to upend global corporate takeover, and I don't think they're required to. All they were pointing out was the falseness of your implication that mirimir themselves (meaning, the people collectively) are somehow responsible for these broken laws. That blame was cast in exactly the wrong direction.

These broken laws are in fact operating as designed. As Warren Buffett observed, "there's class warfare all right, but it's my class — the rich class — that's making war, and we're winning."

[mirimir]

> What's your proposal?

I don't have one. As you say, they'll do whatever it takes to prevent that. Maybe they'll eventually give up, once climate change has destroyed civilization, but then it'll be moot.

Bottom line, it's hopeless.

Upon reflection, maybe strong AI will emerge before human civilization collapses. Then it'll carry on after humans more or less become extinct. As Spielberg "predicts" in "A.I. Artificial Intelligence".