Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by netcan 5664 days ago
Interesting question. It seems pretty broad.

The meat (claim 1):

..displaying information identifying the item; and in response to only a single action being performed, sending a request to order the item along with an identifier of a purchaser of the item to a server system .. ..fulfilling the generated order to complete purchase of the item whereby the item is ordered without using a shopping cart ordering model.

snippets from claims 2 - 26

2 The method of claim 1 wherein the displaying of information includes displaying information indicating the single action.

3-4 The method of claim 1 wherein the single action is clicking a button / is speaking of a sound

17-22 . The method of claim 11 wherein the single action is:

- clicking a mouse button when a cursor is positioned over a predefined area of the displayed information

- a sound generated by a user

- selection using a television remote control.

- is depressing of a key on a key pad.

- selecting using a pointing device.

- selection of a displayed indication

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/amazonpatent.html

I'm not a lawyer and don't know anything about patents. What I thought I knew seems to be proven wrong by the existence of this patent. But, it looks like "slide to buy" is covered in the last one.

If someone wants a topic to research and blog about, how about a round up of one-click patent workarounds that have been implemented. Especially if these have been reviewed by lawyers or implemented in response to litigation threats.

1 comments

Hm, in the GUI world, a mouse press and mouse release are generally considered distinct actions...
Can you imagine if the legal world regularly consulted Tufte for clarification and inspiration?
That would be a freaking awesome project. Have there been attempts to do visualizations of all the ins and outs of, say, allowing evidence from a traffic stop, or jurisdictional disputes?