| > You're trying to make it sound abundantly reasonable that the OP's ideology is inconsistent No, I'm asserting that it's inconsistent (based on studying these sorts of purportedly "egalitarian" racial/gender ideologies). Anyone is welcome to make a counterargument. > lots of people would completely disagree with that I know. And I find their justifications fascinating, as previously mentioned. > then you're pretending like it's obvious and not up for debate. In many ways it is obvious. "Racism isn't racism if it targets $RACE people" is one variation of a popular slogan. In any case, as mentioned several times now, my position is "yes, more debate", yours is "debate is pointless". > More fanning the flames. Why? I'm not "fanning flames", I'm inviting debate. And as previously mentioned, I find the debate interesting. Incidentally it also tends to publicize the inconsistencies in the ideology, which is a nice side effect. |