Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by parliament32 2579 days ago
That's an insane number of shards, you should be closer to 500 for that amount of data and only 6 nodes.
1 comments

It's due to the number of indicies/indexes stored from our various data sources. Yours and another poster's comments are interesting so we might look at ways we can reduce the shard count given the new info on overhead.