[metalliqaz]

Not all. The large majority, but not all. There are very likely one or two drivers in the area that don't participate, simply because they aren't in the parking lot at the moment they orchestrate the mass logout. Surge pricing is about supply and demand, so if expected demand is high (like at an airport) they need a lot more than one or two drivers.

[mikeash]

I don’t think it even necessarily needs to be a large majority. It just needs to be enough such that the remaining drivers aren’t sufficient to meet demand. Depending on circumstances, that could require anywhere from one driver to all of them.

It’s a great illustration of how supply and demand work to determine prices.

[metalliqaz]

Yeah, agreed, but these guys are going for maximum rate, so they have to get as many as possible.

[mikeash]

Indeed. And as the rate grows higher, there’s ever more incentive to defect from the scheme. This should be a case study taught in Economics 101, it’s so pure and clear!

[kevin_b_er]

Well, yes. It will settle at the rate they're actually willing to be paid, not the one their "employer" is setting for them.

[duxup]

Maybe not all, but I wouldn't be surpised to see someone "not participating" txting a buddy "prices up".

Someone has to check it to make sure it is working.

[netsharc]

Couldn't they check using the passenger app?

[duxup]

I the rate that the passenger sees always the rate that the driver is paid?

If so then yeah, but I'm not sure they're always 1:1.

[eropple]

It used to be almost exactly proportional. Lyft and Uber have been progressively trying to disconnect the two values, though; these days it's probably not possible to tell.