[CptFribble]

> I'm not sure how a strong AI is supposed to fix that.

presumably a sufficiently advanced AI could find or create a technical solution that perfectly solves the problem with no downsides, or at least so little downside or cost that even those who "don't believe" in climate change couldn't refuse trying it out.

[ngrilly]

This "advanced AI" would need to be able to experiment in the real world, as human scientists do. This is the only way to observe the universe, and validate a theory. For example, the AI could need to build and run something devices like the Large Hadron Collider, the Hubble telescope, or a molten salt reactor, to test its hypothesis.