|
|
|
|
|
|
by arugulum
2584 days ago
|
|
|
>Has the same issue as Pascal's. I get the feeling that some people (maybe not this commenter) are missing the point I'm making. Yes, Pascal's wager is flawed - which is why I'm modeling the Altman's wager after it. I thought I had made the wording and respective payoff statements sufficiently tongue-in-cheek, but I guess this is Poe's law biting back. |
|
|
(also, as much as I'm also tongue in cheek when talking about AGIs punishing [infinite numbers of simulations of] Sam Altman for backing the wrong AGI project, I'm dead serious about them potentially being able to turn a decent profit selling advanced data processing to Silicon Valley startups. And let's face it, Sam's a much better CEO to be able to help them achieve that than AI Rapture anyway)