Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zaroth 2595 days ago
I’d say the problem is less discovery as it is monetization.

The total bandwidth for one of these creators’ videos is not itself all that massive. Particularly if you are not live streaming, a few thousand dollars in hosting costs a year to get 100TB/mo dedicated servers in a couple datacenters.

But once you have the servers humming and serving a few million views a month, whose ads are you running alongside your content?

1 comments

Patreon has proved people are willing to pay for content. We just need an easier way to do it.
Patron is fractions of a percent of the GDP of YouTube’s content creator payout, and patron works for only a fraction of creators. It’s not even a comparison.