|
|
|
|
|
by nopinsight
2591 days ago
|
|
What are some good reasons that things are organized this way? I’ve heard that long shifts help with continuity as fewer doctors need to pass information about the same patient thus reducing communications overhead a bit. Anything else? If only that, it seems the drawbacks in terms of risks to care quality as well as to the resident’s learning & long-term health may be greater than the benefits. |
|
The thing with continuity is right. Hand-overs always means some degree of information loss, especially for non-verbal information. One of the most imporant clues indicating need for surgery can be the character of stomach pains upon manual examination for example. If the same surgeon does the examination with some hours intervals, he or she may be able to detect subtle signs of deterioration which a new surgeon would not.
> resident’s [...] long-term health
Oh. Well. Haha. When an anesthesiologist colleague of mine commited suicide at one point the only thing we were told at the morning briefing was that the planned surgeries of the day would regrettably not be initiated exactly on time.