[abecedarius]

The linked paper, TDT-v01o.pdf, is bit-identical to a draft I downloaded in November. Which is odd since I thought I remembered a few drafty features in it like incomplete references to be filled in later, and it ends with "This manuscript was cut off here" and a one-entry bibliography.

Did they link to the wrong version?

[Korsharat]

You do realize that the linked article dates from November the 12th, do you? It linked to the most recent version which was then available.

[abecedarius]

I didn't notice -- thanks. I only skimmed the announcement and got the impression of a polished version ready to submit to some fancy journal.

It's interesting as is, anyway, judging by the first half. I'll be getting back to it.

[ewjordan]

Did they link to the wrong version?

It certainly looks like it. Maybe if Eliezer sees this he can post a link to the actual finished copy?

FWIW, though, whether finished or not there's a lot of really interesting stuff in there, definitely worth a read, even if you know/care nothing about/for decision theory.

[noglorp]

Indeed! This paper seeems to have been so highly anticipated, it was released by those anticipating it before it was finished.