|
|
|
|
|
by admax88q
2587 days ago
|
|
> The fact that I can recompile all of the software I use, is a really important feature to me and not a distribution problem. I've always found this to be an interesting observation about free software. So many complicated things like FatELF, dll-hell are just straight up _not_ and issue when you're working in a source code world where you just compile the software for the machine you're using it on. Most of the efforts around FatELF, FlatPak, etc seem to be to be driven by the desires of corporations who want to ship proprietary software on linux, and as such need better standardization at the binary level rather than the software level. It's a win for Free Software in my mind, that we shouldn't typically have to worry about this added complexity. Just ship source code, and distributions can ship binaries compiled for each specific configuration that they choose to support. |
|
As an example Slackware distributes a shareware image viewer/manipulator called xv (which was very popular once upon a time): http://www.trilon.com/xv/
It is the license that makes something FOSS, not being able to compile/modify the source code.