|
|
|
|
|
by chrisseaton
2588 days ago
|
|
> Oh screw off. Please try not to be abusive. > result in a warning because the cop realizes after getting a closer look at the vehicle and its occupants and realizing that there's nothing sketchy going on If there's nothing sketchy going on... what are they getting a warning for? > You can't make a good first impression on a speed camera... I'd much rather have laws that go fishing than robots that enforce the law to the letter 100% of the time. I don't want people being let off because they make a good impression! That lets the police enforce laws based on their biases, such as race or gender. I'd much rather have simple factual enforcement. Either you were speeding or not. |
|
As far as internet comments go I think it's more than a stretch to put "screw off" in the abusive bucket.
>what are they getting a warning for?
So the cop can have a paper trail proving he was awake and working.
>I don't want people being let off because they make a good impression! That lets the police enforce laws based on their biases, such as race or gender. I'd much rather have simple factual enforcement. Either you were speeding or not.
Automated enforcement of the letter of the law would instantly screw basically everyone. I don't think you understand how many letter of the law violations cops see every day and choose not to do anything about.