| "There's a cultural difference here. In a culture of collaboration that experience is simulated for the group to grow mutually." So, to 'grow mutually', we need to use ideas that never work or will take the project down a path of failure? This does not foster growth or success. I want the best ideas to win, if it's mine or from an inexperienced colleague. "The difference is motivation of growth vs money." You can try bad ideas on your own time If you are working on a project and being paid for it, I don't really know how it doesn't have some motivation for money. "I never said I won't listen. I value people who focus on collaboration because I can trust they have a stake in our mutual growth. This is not a feeling rather a thought." Teaching you the proper way is focusing on mutual growth, so you will be successful in future projects that might involve the same problem. "No, I credit the people who create the bias around them in everyday interactions. Bottom line is that present day moments are not made up of stereotypes. People are responsible for their behaviors and attitudes." So you don't want to be told what to do and you have no problem with a company ushering out more experienced developers and replacing them with ones that are cheaper and younger. While people are responsible for their behaviors and attitudes, I can't imagine if you were in the same situation you wouldn't be resentful. This is because you are young. In 15-20 years, I think your attitude and outlook on life will be much different. |
Not sure where you are getting that from... Sounds like you have a negative bias towards inexperience. A collaborative culture sees situations as opportunities to grow.
> I want the best ideas to win, if it's mine or from an inexperienced colleague.
That describes a competitive/market culture in the organizational theory of Robert Quinn and Kim Cameron.
> Teaching you the proper way is focusing on mutual growth, so you will be successful in future projects that might involve the same problem.
I disagree. Teacher -> student relationship is one way. What I want is peer <-> peer focused on exchanging knowledge.
Personally, I've experienced what you are suggesting. It didn't work for me and my sound perspective was often dismissed.
> So you don't want to be told what to do and you have no problem with a company ushering out more experienced developers and replacing them with ones that are cheaper and younger.
Wooahhh, what a strawman argument. 1: I want autonomy in an organization. 2. Never said any of that.
> While people are responsible for their behaviors and attitudes, I can't imagine if you were in the same situation you wouldn't be resentful. This is because you are young. In 15-20 years, I think your attitude and outlook on life will be much different.
Don't project yourself onto me. You don't know me well enough to make that assertion.
Overall, based on your comments I think you have a lot of negative biases from past experiences that you are projecting on an internet stranger. It's ok to have our differences. There is no 'silver bullet' culture. I've participated in a culture similar to what you are suggesting. I grew a lot and enjoyed learning from others. I've grown older and want a different environment that I think is best for my growth and QOL.