|
|
|
|
|
by jsbaby608
2599 days ago
|
|
The WHO list is heavily biased toward quantity of care (IE: socialized) and not quality. So, it's not really a good judge of the best quality. If 10x Americans are getting surgery overseas because it's cheaper, this doesn't mean it's better. Our disussion is about the best quality, not on price. Show me the studies where government-run care saves money, yet has the exact same quality as US care. Judging outcomes and life expectancy is a red herring, because different populations have different diets, lifestyles, and genetics, which definitely leads to different outcomes. If are sacrificing quality for cheaper care...no thanks. I also see my mention of Surgery by committee is ignored in your comments. I'm assuming this means you know this is true. Why would I want this? |
|