| > What's the difference, functionally speaking? (Asking honestly, not being snarky -- I may not understand what you are saying / what the equivalent postgres feature is?) You create a single index, e.g: create index on the_table using gin(jsonb_column); And that will support many different types of conditions, e.g.: check if a specific key/value combination is contained in the JSON: where jsonb_column @> '{"key": "value"}' this also works with nested values: where jsonb_column @> '{"key1" : {"key2": {"key3": 42}}}' Or you can check if an array below a key contains one or multiple values: where jsonb_column @> '{"tags": ["one"]}'
or
where jsonb_column @> '{"tags": ["one", "two"]}' Or you can check if all keys from a list of keys are present: where jsonb_column ?& array['key1', 'key2'] All those conditions are covered by just one index. |
Out of curiosity, how commonly is this used at scale? I'd imagine there are significant trade-offs with write amplification, meaning it would consume a lot of space and make writes slow. (vs making indexes on specific expressions, I mean. That said, you're right -- there are definitely use-cases where making indexes on specific expressions isn't practical or is too inflexible.)