|
|
|
|
|
|
by SkyBelow
2604 days ago
|
|
|
It's like trusting all the evidence presented by the prosecutor during a court case. Yes, likely none of that is faked or outright lies, but until you give the defense a chance to respond it shouldn't be trusted as accurate representation. If we wouldn't trust the evidence from a prosecutor by itself, why would we trust evidence from an entity fulfilling the same role in the court of public opinion? |
|
|
Take the OJ Simpson criminal trial, for instance.
...or the Lori Loughlin college bribery and money-laundering scandal.
...or the Aaron Swartz travesty.