|
|
|
|
|
|
by lucb1e
2604 days ago
|
|
|
But that hash is a regular, fast hash that takes like 1µs to compute right? Doesn't that get lost in network jitter? Wouldn't averaging the time it takes to run for(i=0;i<Math.pow(2,18);i++); over 10 runs be much more accurate? Or is this meant to spite the 0.01% of visitors that really try not to be tracked and have turned off javascript? |
|
|
They use SHA512 which is fast, but noticeable for large enough files.
> Or is this meant to spite the 0.01% of visitors that really try not to be tracked and have turned off javascript?
Yes, the point is that it works with blockers.