[yeahitslikethat]

The US treasury loans the cash at zero interest to the Fed (which is actually a coalition of corporate banks, not a federal government entity).

The Fed then loans that money out with interest and backed by the good faith in the us government.

This means the banks which as major holders of stock in Facebook, most of whom want Zuckerberg out as ceo, are also incentivized to pursue a bigger fine.

[chki]

Sorry to be a bit harsh but those are a lot of strange claims.

The Fed comes very close to a government entity in that its board is nominated by the government and confirmed by the Senate. It is not made up of corporate banks and is definitely not a coalition of corporate banks.

I'm not sure how you get the idea that the US Treasury loans the fine to the Fed? Do you have a source for that?

And if those big banks are major stock holders of Facebook they definitely do not want fines imposed on Facebook. Loosing money is the one thing that businesses need to avoid and fines are a pretty direct way of hurting business while not being useful in any way. Just because those banks might want to see Zuckerberg go (which is not necessarily right) they do definitely not want to loose money to make that happen. Fines are also not very effective in that regard.

[yeahitslikethat]

They want that to happen if it means they can accelerate profits plus interest on the loans faster than new fine minus $5 billion.

Fed is a corporation source, there are plenty. It's common knowledge, " the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stated that: "The Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA [the Federal Tort Claims Act], but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations." "

Loans to the banks: "By the end of 2008, Goldman had snarfed up $34 billion in federal loans – and it was paying an interest rate of as low as just 0.01 percent for the huge cash infusion. "

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/secrets-...