[ben_w]

You jest, but TicTacs are allowed to be labelled “sugar free” despite being 91.3% sugar because, to quote, “the amount of sugar per serving (1 mint) is less than 0.5 grams, FDA labeling requirements permit the Nutrition Facts to state that there are 0 grams of sugar per serving“ - https://www.tictacusa.com/en/faq

[zerocrates]

You could easily notice this same thing in the early days of trans fat removal from product: it was common to see labels and nutrition panels touting "0g trans fats" but have partially hydrogenated oils pretty high up the ingredients list: again mostly on the back of a small serving size. I suppose it's still around in some product categories.

I don't recall ever seeing Tic Tacs actually claim "sugar free," though. "Zero grams" is allowed and most people read it the same way, while "sugar free" actually has some more requirements to be able to use.

[benj111]

So Nutrition facts can round to the nearest gram despite allowing servings to be less than a gram? What a well thought out policy.

Ps I thought the US used imperial measures, why are grams getting used?

[bluGill]

US is a mix of measures. Imperial is allowed, but there are only a few places where it is required. Metric is in fact very common - but only for measures not in day to day use (that is intentionally contradictory have fun figuring it out)

[benj111]

In Europe theres regulations over labelling etc.

In the UK if you buy a 'pint' of milk it will still be labelled 0.568 litres.

Presumably there are some rules in the US also, or labels could just use some obscure measures that hide what a product contains.

[vinay427]

Yes, there are definitely rules. Virtually every product on store shelves in the US seems to be labeled with metric or imperial units depending on what is more convenient or less obscure to the public, though sizes for many products are the same across the oceans which can make for weird numbers for everyone.

Labeling definitely isn't always imperial in the US, and it isn't always metric in many European countries. Regulations tend to do a good job of avoiding units that are obscure in that they're rarely used for the specific purpose in question or would have clumsy numbers like the pint to liters conversion you noted.

e.g. A common PET bottle size in the US and elsewhere is 0.5L, which in the US is labeled as "0.5L"/"500mL" usually along with the, in my opinion, somewhat pointless "16.9 fl oz". Meanwhile, a 2L PET bottle is also common in the US and is labeled (and known by virtually everyone) as "2L".

[NullPrefix]

>which in the US is labeled as "0.5L"/"500mL" usually along

I hope that you mean it's labeled as 0.5L or 500mL and not both of them with a slash.

[vinay427]

Yes, exactly. I was hoping my quotes helped clarify that but I can see how it's unclear...

[NeedMoreTea]

lol. I do love the way so many foods come up with a "serving" that almost no human customer has ever duplicated.

[pbhjpbhj]

That's bad, but just because they're allowed doesn't mean they should do it.