[_Schizotypy]

I think the term 'organization' is pretty important here, more-so than pokemon

'Experience with pokemon suggests eccentricity drives organization of visual cortex'?

'Childhood experience suggests eccentricity drives organization of visual cortex'?

[mjlee]

The second would fit - but I think Pokémon has to appear in the title for the novelty value alone.

[_Schizotypy]

From my experience reading research into articles relating to neuroscience, when omitting the term 'organization', 'driving' something implies a sort of 'this is what is powering the...' or 'this is what is stimulating the...' I agree that including the term 'pokemon' would drive some readers to the article, omitting 'organization' obfuscates what the article is really about