|
|
|
|
|
by jakelazaroff
2606 days ago
|
|
I don't understand the argument you're making here. You guess this is a PR stunt to draw attention to… something other than forced arbitration? Given that all attention is focused on their explicitly stated demands around forced arbitration and sexual harassment, if this is a PR campaign in disguise for some other issue it's a huge failure. Really, I don't see any possible gains for them here other than what they're explicitly asking for. What do you think this is really about? |
|