|
|
|
|
|
by afiori
2608 days ago
|
|
I think the ?? can be already used for Result<Result<_,_>,_>. I agree that the syntax should have `await' somewhere, and the observation that it "clearly" is not a field access is actually credible to me. This also open the possibility to have other kinds of postfix keyword e.g. .try or .match |
|