[unknownsavage]

For people who haven't read the article this is extremely misleading:

> The ends with him agreeing how the film sucks and maybe the prosecutor was right!

He says that, only as a joke that it's so bad it should've been illegal. While in reality a great mis-justice was done to the man, and he was railroaded into accepting a plea-deal due to the gravity of the unfair charges.

[SlowRobotAhead]

Yea, that’s the point. I don’t remember saying “don’t read the article”. He makes a joke about his previous work and that’s a likable thing to do.