|
|
|
|
|
by 2T1Qka0rEiPr
2609 days ago
|
|
Weird aside question: I notice the article says "at approximately 10:00pm GMT". Can someone explain why GMT might be chosen as a reference point here? Is there something I'm missing about the usage of GMT (and not UTC). It just seems particularly odd given that GMT is not (to my knowledge) actually being used as a concrete time-zone at the minute (BST is in effect for daylight savings). |
|
For a long time GMT was a good reference point. Times have changed.
I used to work with a gentleman who would always schedule meetings on the phone as:
> Great, let's put that on the schedule for 2:00 o'clock Eastern Standard Time.
There was always a bit of officiousness to his tone and I think he just liked the idea of being precise.
And he certainly was precise. He was also off by an hour for half the year. Somehow no one ever missed a meeting, though.
I always sat on the other side of the room and ground my teeth.