|
|
|
|
|
by huffmsa
2607 days ago
|
|
> Whoever said programming side projects should be “full-stress cases”? That's what the context is here. There's a notion in the software development profession that you should have a side project which you put near full-time hours and / or effort into. Because you love coding so much you can't stop. Be it your future start-up, or contributing to an open source project (or 3). Studying law is equivalent to reading the tech news / seing what other people are doing / keeping up with best practices. Actually writing a project using it is another level of complexity. It's the difference between reading and analyzing the arguments of a legal case and reconstructing and presenting the arguments yourself. |
|
I disagree.
> There's a notion in the software development profession that you should have a side project which you put near full-time hours and / or effort into.
There's a common notion that you should be doing practical learning, including side projects, outside of “normal” paid work. It is far less common, however, to encounter the idea that it should be near full-time hours (and it's not clear to me what “full-time effort” distinct from hours even could mean.)
> Studying law is equivalent to reading the tech news / seing what other people are doing / keeping up with best practices.
No, it's not: in fact, this kind of professional reading is often expressly excluded from the definition of activities that apply to continuing legal education requirements. Lawyers do, as a practical matter, need to do the equivalent of what you are talking about, but in addition to not as their CLE requirement.