|
|
|
|
|
by dredmorbius
2610 days ago
|
|
The value changes from gentrification or owner flight (see' most mid-century US cities) come from the community rather than any significant owner-initiated changes to the propety itself. You do nothing, rich people move in around you, value increases. You do nothing, rich people move out around you, value decreases. The direct utility of the property is unchanged. The owner has made, net, an insignificant contribution to the surrounding community. And yet value accrues (or diminishes) all the same. Housing and real estate internalise the net community utility changes. The pathological cases are where the owners or investors are outside the community and strip-mine the resulting wealth. Land value taxes both dampen wild valuation swings and internalise value gains to the community to provide infrastructure, institutions, and services. |
|
Land value tax would take money from people who don't need those community services and give it to different people who happen to live nearby. That's not really fair. It's still a kind of rent seeking that also happens to give the rent to charity but not back to the original payers in proportion to what they paid. But it does sound more reasonable than the luck of the draw that property owners get.