[vorpalhex]

This is kind of grossly simplified though, isn't it?

> 1.2 Avoid harm to others

So no smart weapons which minimize collateral damage?

> 1.5 Honor property rights including copyrights and patent.

So no Sci-Hub? What about bad copyrights?

> 1.8 Honor confidentiality.

What about whistleblowing?

[Kalium]

It's worth mentioning that the text you are responding to is the overview. The ACM offers greater detail that addresses your concerns: https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics

> So no smart weapons which minimize collateral damage?

This section is concerned with indirect and unintentional harm. Weapons tend to be a problem for every ethical system. Here, my reading would be that weapons should work as intended.

> So no Sci-Hub? What about bad copyrights?

What is a bad copyright is not a question for the ACM code of ethics. You'll find a more detailed examination of intellectual property in the full code of ethics.

> What about whistleblowing?

An excellent question! I'll just quote from the discussion directly:

> Computing professionals are often entrusted with confidential information such as trade secrets, client data, nonpublic business strategies, financial information, research data, pre-publication scholarly articles, and patent applications. Computing professionals should protect confidentiality except in cases where it is evidence of the violation of law, of organizational regulations, or of the Code. In these cases, the nature or contents of that information should not be disclosed except to appropriate authorities. A computing professional should consider thoughtfully whether such disclosures are consistent with the Code.

[MaxBarraclough]

> So no Sci-Hub?

The ACM are a major academic publisher.