|
|
|
|
|
by pradn
2613 days ago
|
|
Thank you for your response. I'm greatly encouraged that the license is CC-BY-SA. That's definitely in the public good. I do believe there is space for non-Wikipedia knowledge repositories. Look at Wikia, for example. People do want to store all their fandom knowledge somewhere. It's just that Wikipedia might not be the place for it. I also agree that the underinvestment in tools can limit contributions. Wikipedia's new visual editor is the biggest step they've taken in making editing easily accessible. They also have new translation and analysis tools. Not to mention all the specialized wikis under the umbrella - Wiktionary, Wikidata, etc. I do wonder if it's enough though. Thanks for your work. I hope you can find a balanced business model. |
|