[acrispino]

That is not part of xerrors at this point. Rationale: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/29934#issuecomment-46420...

Personally, I don't care for "string magic"

Edit: Instead of making another post, I'll add this here. It also feels odd that concerns about xerrors.As possibly panicking at runtime are considered addressed by the addition of a go vet check: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/29934#issuecomment-46252...

I am not opposed to go vet, to be clear, but one of the aspects of the go compiler is that it does not warn, only errors out if compilation can't proceed. But the design of xerrors.As is fine because go vet acts like a compiler warning might? This is an aesthetic complaint more than anything else, but it still doesn't sit right with me.

[llimllib]

Thank you, my bad!