Since you don't actually access the size of the structure, I see no reason why it matters. Also, FWIW, your code has undefined behavior because you call printf with the wrong type.
Yes on the UB, I'm passing a "char" into a "char *", sorry about that. I don't pass lone char data that often.
Well, I chose this example specifically to ask whether the resulting memory structure, completely independent of calling a sizeof(), would still be as if I were to call a sizeof() (which then I believe would be 4 bytes large) if not accessing the total size of the struct or any of the padding members.
It makes a difference in the memory footprint, which can become important, if you're programming a device with just 64-bytes total RAM.
Well, I chose this example specifically to ask whether the resulting memory structure, completely independent of calling a sizeof(), would still be as if I were to call a sizeof() (which then I believe would be 4 bytes large) if not accessing the total size of the struct or any of the padding members.
It makes a difference in the memory footprint, which can become important, if you're programming a device with just 64-bytes total RAM.