Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by shikoba 2611 days ago
> the kind of people who memorise answer books, question lists, etc. - will outperform people who are smart and skilled

If people who just memorize can outperform smart people, it just means that the one conducting the interview is not really smart, and so incapable of recognizing expertise.

2 comments

As someone who has had far more failures at evaluating candidates than successes, I find it very hard to wade through the BS in a meeting that lasts an hour or two. The strangest people I've met seemed normal for that short of time. I usually have to work with someone for up to six months to get a real feeling of their ability to adjust to new situations, learn new technology, and strength of work ethic.
That's what I saw my whole life. People conducting interview don't know how to spot BS and fraud.
> If people who just memorize can outperform smart people, it just means that the one conducting the interview is not really smart, and so incapable of recognizing expertise.

No, it means that interviewing is a lousy way to select people and it's full of bias. We know this. We know that interviewing doesn't select the best candidate.

> it's full of bias

My comment was not saying the opposite.

> best candidate

I never was talking about best candidate.