[cbzry]

>After two days of intense public interest, iFixit has removed our teardown of Samsung’s Galaxy Fold.

But... you are ifixit?

[XMPPwocky]

This is just phrasing.

Read as "We at iFixit have"...

[cbzry]

Then it shouldn't mix first and third person in the same sentence. "ifixit (they) have removed our review". Makes no sense. It sounds like they are two different entities.

[LeifCarrotson]

The author of this blog post is speaking as a representative of iFixit.

If you were authorized to represent CBRZY Inc, you could write a blog post and include the phrase "CBRZY Inc have published our comment suggesting that a representative writing for us shouldn't speak in third person." without sounding awkward.

[cbzry]

Then the post should not be anonymously signed as "ifixit staff".

[bunderbunder]

<shrug>

So something got posted online without first consulting Grammarly. It's just a venial sin, not a mortal one.

[jcelerier]

ifixit.org may have people not on board with ifixit.com