|
|
|
|
|
by ziggystardust
2610 days ago
|
|
Would you have used say, a video call web app that could bill the client immediately after the call based on the call minutes ? Or would you still prefer to go for retainers ? What I’m trying to understand is why the decision to move from billable calls to retainer model? Was it only the ease of invoicing or were there other factors ? Also,
“Dismissing the use of simple tools or feeling like everything has to be automated and perfect is a recipe for disaster” “Automate only once you have a repeatable process that has low to no variation in output” Love these two advice!
Applicable to almost every business |
|
I never invoiced clients immediately for a service, everything was based on written contracts, and no I wouldn't use an app like that ever for a professional client. Businesses have a typical cadence of weekly or monthly invoicing, doing anything more rapid is less a professional service and more a buy here/pay here credit card mentality. There is nothing wrong with that more immediate model mind you, just isn't the same thing as a contractual service between businesses.
If my goal was the immediate model you are discussing, I'd require a payment up front before the call/service was delivered. e.g. you pay for the call, then are connected and the payment covers up to a certain time period with no refunds, more time more money. Or alternatively, the payment details are taken up front but the time is tracked and the payment is completed once the call is done. But that isn't a B2B transaction, that's more a consumer model, again, nothing wrong with it, just different strokes.