|
|
|
|
|
by neilv
2619 days ago
|
|
That Wired article currently has an "Update 12/14/2015" vague small note added at the very end, suggesting some doubt. That note would be better at the beginning of the article, than the end, IMHO. If a real retraction is warranted (I don't know whether it is), then Wired should do it, with or without the original writers. |
|