[cmm]

I see that at this point in time Smalltalk and Lisp machines have become completely memory-holed (oh wait, Smalltalk & Lisp are interactive, thus "interpreted", thus obviously not compiled! I'll show myself out)

[IronBacon]

Don't know about Smalltalk but there are numerous CL compilers...

[hencq]

I'm pretty sure that's exactly their point. People assume that interactive means interpreted, but that doesn't need to be the case.

[IronBacon]

Ah, my bad, I didn't caught the sarcasm in that post. Yeah, it makes sense now... ^__^;

[bitwize]

Smalltalk is compiled to bytecode.

[gokr]

Smalltalk is a family of dialects and implementations. Most of them are indeed compiled to bytecode which is then executed by a JIT VM. Most of them use the "image" concept where you are always in runtime like in a classic Lisp, and yes, the VM handles shape changes etc etc. But some Smalltalks actually have other characteristics, like non JIT or even compiling via C (Smalltalk/X does that I believe).

[pjmlp]

Which were originally the CPU instructions of Dorado, given its microcoded CPU.

And gave birth to all modern JITs.