| A few thoughts after reading this as a mechanical engineer: 1. My understanding: this material relies on mechanical work (force x distance = work energy) to add energy to the material by compressing (or tensioning, or "magnetically stressing", which I don't understand) it. Some fraction of this energy is converted phase transitions which absorb heat, and some fraction is retained as spring potential energy. If the material is then heated by ambient air, and then the material is allowed to expand, it will now be at a temperature above the ambient temperature at the start of the cycle. In this way it is similar to a standard refrigeration cycle- just without pipes. 2. The cycle described in point 1 is not particularly unique to this material. You could do a similar process with any mechanical spring (google "rubber band heat engine"), and achieve similar results. This material is likely uniquely well suited to this application because it has usefully large amounts of heat associated with phase transitions at temperatures that correspond well with the temperatures used in a refrigeration cycle. 3. You want the material to dump heat to a hot reservoir while hot and suck heat from a cold reservoir while cold. Standard, fluid based refrigeration cycles do this by pumping the refrigerant to different locations (the condensor and evaporator). (I am assuming) This process would have to open and close dampers to get the hot reservoir air and the cold reservoir air to flow across the material; otherwise you have to move the material between the two locations. Both of these sound expensive/tricky to me. 4. A large challenge here is creating an electrical actuator that can compress the material. It would the following design objectives/constraints: 4a. The material should be shaped into long, narrow rods, or another shape with a large surface area, to be ideal for maximum heat transfer with the air of the hot and cold reservoirs. 4b. The actuator must recover the work energy provided when the material is allowed to expand. 4c. The actuator will have a very short stroke (solids do not compress very far), and large force. 4d. The actuator must last many thousands or millions of cycles without wearing out. 5. This style of refrigeration does not have any higher theoretical or actual efficiency than a fluids-based cycle. However, refrigerants have historically been environmentally damaging when released to the atmosphere. R-12 kills ozone, and is obselete/ outlawed. R-134a is currently in a lot of new systems, there are also newer refrigerants being put into new cars. The only thing particularly bad about R-134a is that 1 kg of R-134a equals several thousand kg's of CO2 in terms of global warming effect. |
1. Mechanical compression using hydraulic fluid and electric pumps? 2. Could the hydraulic fluid be used as the heat transference mechanism? 3. Could this material be used in a liquid Sterling cycle pump?
I'm thinking a combination of these might be the answer; the material at one end of a closed cylinder with a piston compressing hydraulic fluid, and the reciprocating motion through some means (and the hydraulic fluid) moving the heat from the material one end to the other end of the cylinder (where it could be dumped).