|
|
|
|
|
by magicalhippo
2618 days ago
|
|
I found the exact opposite when learning math. I need to write it down, and when presented with Power Point I have to transform it into something I can understand, and that means I don't have enough attention left to really listen to the lecturer. On the other hand, the lecturers that used a blackboard at my uni all had prepared the lecture, what they wrote was meant to be written in a notebook. They wrote it at a pace that could easily be followed. This allowed me to go over proofs as I wrote them down, and I could then ask right away if there was anything unclear. I also found several typos (usually a sign error or a missing term) this way, something which would probably have confused me a lot if I didn't catch it until I got home. So, for me, well-prepared blackboard lectures is preferable, at least for math heavy stuff. |
|
1.Elementary Reading 2.Inspectional Reading 3.Analytical Reading 4.Syntopical Reading
The first 2-3 are covered in the lecture. The time at home can then be spent putting it to paper, applying it in practice (usually in MatLab or some other form of programming), then summarising. That's why I like the lecturers electronic hand-outs, as it can fill the gaps of knowledge that have formed between lecture and study. My background is in EE however, so assumedly this type of learning might not apply as well to pure Math/Physics!